Wednesday, August 6, 2008

The Classic Image of the Evolution of Homo sapiens

Today was a rest day, that is no gym for me today. Instead I did a few, or more than a few, 12 ounce curls poolside and then at the local pub. However, while doing so, I got to thinking about the "classic" image of human evolution (see picture at top of blog). This image is incorrect on several levels (and updated images may appear at this site). OK, granted our ancestors most likely walked on all fours eventually graduating to bipedal locomotion (think Lucy, Australopithicenes and such[e.g., 1, 2]). 

Now, look more closely. Which of the stages would you want to be? Ideally I would like to be the last image - the super fit dude sitting at the computer, because I assume when you sit at a computer hunched over like our primate brethren than you are actually doing something worthwhile at the machine, say something like programming, running statistical or mathematical analyses, or contributing to web 2.0 (!) In reality, however, that is not the case. Think for a minute of your friends and acquaintances that spend a significant amount of time in front a computer. Are they fit? Do they resemble Arnold? No. Rather they are the epitome of what popular men's fitness magazines (e.g. Men's Health) argue we should not be striving to be like. So much is the state of health of people in clerical and desk tied positions that it has become common place, or at least encouraged for companies to incorporate on-site fitness centers [3, 4] and / or health club benefits (e.g. discounted memberships, [e.g., 5]). In fact, the average desk worker/clerical staff is overweight and unfit. No wonder! They sit all day long and eat terribly (This image might be more accurate). The only exercise office workers get is moving their fingers quickly along their ergonomically designed (i.e. reduce even more work of you having to actually twist your wrist to type) keyboard and the eventual standing squat when nature calls. They may play for the company softball or football squad, but we all know what happens after one of those games - to the pub! Hooters anyone? Last I read, Wings and Beer were not atop the post-workout meal recommendations.  Not that I am knocking Hooters. Quite the contrary for several reasons (think in pairs here), not the least of which they (also) make a damn good hot wing.  But, as you might have guessed, I also like Hooters for another reason. That's right! The presence of a women, particularly attractive, scantily clad females. Seeing an attractive (and scantily clad) female actually increases testosterone (T) in males. So the benefits of hitting Hooters after a workout could be an increase in basal T, from which we all know assists the development of muscle tissue and strength. Additionally, acute administration of ethanol (the intoxicating active ingredient in beer) can actually also increase T levels (in rats at least, 6)[see also].

What was I writing about? Right, what male image you would want to be in the "classic" image of human evolution (see above). Well I hope I have argued that the final image, one for which most of us strive for, is wholly inaccurate. On the other hand, the first image is wholly correct, but likely one for which most of would not strive for (regardless of whether some of us actually resemble it, you know who you are!) So I think most of us would want to be somewhere between image 3 and 5. I think on most days, image 5 for me - he appears fit and the seed of technology (notice he is carrying a rake not just a stick). On most days, I probably am closer (intellectually speaking) to image 4, or even maybe 3. But that's no matter. What is important, in my mind, is that images 3-5 represent the fitness that we should be striving for. These ancestors (as they are depicted in this image) had to fend off predators (be quick, agile, competitive, strong), catch, hunt and/or gather their own sustenance (be clever, stealthy, goal-oriented, and able to follow through), and compete with one another (physically and mentally) for access to mates. They did not sit around too long, except to 1) conserve energy (e.g., for a hunt/gather, mating, parenting) or 2) to recuperate after one of the above mentioned activities. There were no time cards for work; there was no work "proper"; therefore there were no bosses, desks, etc; and there certainly were not gyms, fitness instructors, or nautilus machines! 

The moral of the story... Take your physical fitness to a level at which it is useful. Be fit so that on any given Sunday you can answer the call to join the local football match, basketball game, or marathon (without feeling like you had died Monday morning at work). Or better yet, take your fitness to a level at which your reproductive fitness might also benefit. Think about what females find attractive (some answers here): sporty physique, good looks (for discussion on a future post), intellectual ability (that is goal-oriented individuals that follow through with their goals), providers (e.g., hunters, gathers; i.e. your bill fold), ... oh yeah and there is that personality thing (more on that in a later post, maybe). Now some females may actually mate with you for another reason, a chemical reason, but again, I must leave that for another post, but hopefully I have piqued your interest. 

Unfortunately, for most of us, to get to that stage, we are forced to join gyms/fitness centers for the sheer fact that hanging ropes from our ceilings and installing a pull-up rack would get most of us divorced (that's bad, from a strictly mating perspective, 7). However, most gyms are equipped with most of the gear (a floor, pull-up bar, dip-bars) needed to properly train using your body weight and I will try to track my progress here over the next few months...

Grain of Salt Clause: Remember, I mentioned early on in this post that I took the day off gym in order to drink beer by the pool, which preceded my going to the pub so you might want to take what is written here, or anywhere on this blog, for that matter with a "grain of salt". As Giles and his wife can attest, after a few hefty Kasteel Brunes my intellectual prowess is less than stellar, not to mention my uncoordinated physical abilities (but still able to slap...) 

Until next time...

2 comments:

gilesdm said...

Loved that post, very interesting, also really liked the way you reference everything, that post workout nutrition page was a good read.

I read someplace that beer is loaded with estrogens, but the evidence seems to suggest otherwise. What’s your personal take on this?

Prof. Steven M. Platek said...

Yes it's true Beer has remnants of a natural source of estrogens (it comes from the hops, see this funny post (http://www.solport.com/roundtable/archives/001150.php) about it), but ingesting beer, and small amounts of alcohol actually increase basal (that is your own body grown T. How the two interact, I am not sure is completely worked out yet.

In my personal opinion, I have never experienced the above symptoms (from the post) as a result of drinking beer. Rather, I seem to experience the T related effects: increases self-confidence, feelings of dominance, and an ability to talk easily with women (shit, that's kind of how my wife and I met). However, as I mentioned in the post, I think, too much beer then renders one in pretty bad shape meaning your level of self-confidence is quickly rattled, your dominance drops like a lead weight, and your ability to attract or talk with women, well, it becomes slurred, at best.

There are well-known quadratic (Inverted U-shaped) effects of alcohol. Take for example my ability to play dart, or pool. Without any beer I suck. 1-4 beers (regular beers, not Kasteels) and I am much better. Any more than that I am dead and you had better watch for flying sharp darts or pool cues. I think the same applies to social relationships. Somewhere between 1-4 beers renders the average male a little better in the mating game, the social game, maybe even the working game, but more than that and you just become a blabbering idiot. So that's my take. :-)